In the ever-evolving landscape of academic fraud, a disturbingly simple trend has emerged: the creation of entirely fictional scientists to manipulate scientific publications. Burkhard Morgenstern, a bioinformatics professor at the University of Göttingen, sheds light on this fraudulent practice, revealing a world where made-up personas not only infiltrate editorial boards but also carve out seemingly legitimate scientific careers.
A notable example is Hoss Cartwright, a fabricated persona invented by Morgenstern, who managed to secure a spot on the editorial boards of five journals without a single published research paper to his name. Cartwright's Curriculum Vitae, meticulously crafted by Morgenstern, detailed a non-existent doctorate, postdoctoral work in an obscure location, and a fictional role as Senior Cattle Manager at the Ponderosa Institute for Bovine Research.
Morgenstern's experiment was born out of frustration with the relentless influx of solicitations from dubious science journals seeking his presence on their editorial boards. To expose the prevalence of such practices, he created Peter Uhnemann, a fictional persona, who effortlessly secured a position on the editorial board of the journal Molecular Biology, part of the OMICS International publishing house.
The extent of this fraudulent trend goes beyond academia, reaching into the realm of popular culture. Borat Sagdiyev, a fictional character known for his comedic exploits, also found a place on the editorial board of at least one journal, Immunology and Vaccines, under the guise of a senior investigator at the University of Kazakhstan.
These fabricated personas serve as sting operations, aiming to expose the manipulation of metrics that determine the credibility of scientific publications. Metrics such as the number of publications, citation counts, and co-author affiliations, while intended to be secondary to the quality of the work, often take precedence in evaluating academic success. The alarming prevalence of this practice underscores the need for a reevaluation of how academic achievements are measured, emphasizing the importance of genuine contributions over manipulative metrics.
More: https://entc.com.ua/en/2036-why-fake-data-when-you-can-fake-a-scientist