Upon conducting a routine check for redundant publications, the editors of our journal were alarmed to discover two strikingly similar articles authored by the same individual. Despite differences in disease focus, the abstracts exhibited significant overlap in wording, prompting further investigation.
Our scrutiny revealed that both articles utilized identical control groups, albeit addressing distinct diseases with varying gender prevalence. What's more, the absence of actual measurement values, replaced solely by Mann-Whitney test results, raised suspicion regarding data presentation.
In an effort to address these concerns, we corresponded with the respective journals and institution, seeking clarification. Unfortunately, our inquiries were met with silence or dismissive responses, further exacerbating our apprehensions.
Undeterred, we pursued this matter, cognizant of its implications for scientific integrity. Despite facing obstacles, including uncooperative journals and institutions, we remain committed to upholding ethical standards in scientific research.
Our resolve led us to seek counsel from the National Board for Ethics in Science, which advised escalating the issue to the University Ethics Board. We have followed this guidance, recognizing the importance of transparency and accountability in maintaining the integrity of academic discourse.
While this incident may not directly involve our journal, we recognize its significance to the broader scientific community. Therefore, we remain steadfast in our pursuit of truth and ethical conduct, ensuring that such practices are upheld at every level of scholarly endeavor.
As stewards of scientific integrity, we urge fellow researchers and institutions to join us in upholding the highest ethical standards, safeguarding the integrity and credibility of academic research for the betterment of society.