![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x723x274-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.HW7uSdT1rb.png)
![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x119x130-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.wrYLO_DTxU.jpg)
In the intricate world of academic publishing, instances of duplicate submission can pose challenges for both authors and journal editors alike. A recent case study sheds light on the complexities and ethical considerations involved in such situations.
Read more: Navigating the Complexities of Academic Publishing: A Case Study on Duplicate Submission
In a recent case, questions have arisen regarding the originality of a paper published in 2022, prompting considerations of retraction due to its high similarity to the authors' previous work from 2019.
Read more: Contemplating Retraction: Assessing Similarity in Published Papers
In a concerning turn of events, authors of a scholarly commentary agreed to remove derogatory content at the request of the journal's editor, only to post an earlier, objectionable version to a preprint site. Despite their assurance to remove the contentious material prior to journal publication, the authors linked the preprint version in the final published article.
Read more: Authors Refer Readers to Objectionable Preprint Version Despite Journal's Request
Manuscripts of monographs and collective monographs are accepted for review on various topics. Current topics of collective monographs at the link.
- Publisher: Scientific Route OÜ®(Estonia)
- Indexing: Scopus, Google Scholar, Zenodo, Digar, etc..
- All monographs are open access.
- Copyright remains with the authors.
- There is a loyalty program for researchers from different countries.
- Special conditions - unique discounts here.
Topics of collective monographs are also available here.
To submit your material, you can use the "Submit a manuscript" function on the website or contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for assistance.
In a recent case study, the question of accountability arises concerning a submitted article flagged for potential self-plagiarism. The scenario unfolded when a manuscript underwent scrutiny through anti-plagiarism software, revealing a 17% similarity score, just under the 20% threshold set by Journal A. Despite meeting this criterion, concerns were raised by a peer reviewer who discovered significant overlap with content previously published in conference proceedings, reaching approximately 80%.
Read more: Handling Duplicate Submission and Self-Plagiarism: Responsibility of Authors
Recent revelations surrounding a surgical study involving children have sparked ethical inquiries, prompting scrutiny from the academic community. The case emerged when a paper, authored by an individual affiliated with a UK institution, detailed a prospective surgical intervention on 10 children, utilizing two techniques during the same operation. Notably, the paper underwent review without detection of the study's nature or mention of consent and ethical approval.
Manuscripts of monographs and collective monographs are accepted for review on various topics. Current topics of collective monographs at the link.
- Publisher: Scientific Route OÜ®(Estonia)
- Indexing: Scopus, Google Scholar, Zenodo, Digar, etc..
- All monographs are open access.
- Copyright remains with the authors.
- There is a loyalty program for researchers from different countries.
- Special conditions - unique discounts here.
Topics of collective monographs are also available here.
To submit your material, you can use the "Submit a manuscript" function on the website or contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for assistance.
Current topics of collective monographs:
- “Education before the challenges of modernity”
- “Post-traumatic syndromes: psychologies of adaptation”
- “Social tension: manifestation and causes”
- “Ecological systems modeling”
- Your topic
Read more: WHO ASKED FOR SCOPUS? COLLECTIVE MONOGRAPHS INDEXED BY SCOPUS AT A SPECIAL PRICE!
In a recent editorial dispute, concerns arose regarding a potential breach of confidentiality by a reviewer involved in the peer review process. The controversy stemmed from an accusation by authors, claiming that a figure in their paper under review had been utilized by the reviewer in a conference presentation while the manuscript was still under evaluation. This accusation led to allegations of misconduct, citing the reviewer's abuse of their position.
Read more: Possible Breach of Confidentiality by a Reviewer: Clarifying an Editorial Dispute