![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x723x274-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.HW7uSdT1rb.png)
![International Collaboration in Health Research: Evaluating a Systematic Review on [Country's Name] by Non-native Authors](/media/djmediatools/cache/images/x119x130-crop-90-ikdaf2cd3qtv1rkqp1sj6ccnzuavwc6srudo0nxz_1.png.pagespeed.ic.wrYLO_DTxU.jpg)
Current topics of collective monographs:
- “Education before the challenges of modernity”
- “Post-traumatic syndromes: psychologies of adaptation”
- “Social tension: manifestation and causes”
- “Ecological systems modeling”
- Your topic
Read more: We are accepting chapters for collective monographs with Scopus indexing!
In a rare predicament, a journal finds itself grappling with the aftermath of accepting an article that the current editorial team believes should have been rejected. The saga began when a former editor greenlit the article for publication following peer review. However, upon closer inspection, the current editor deems the content unfit due to poor language quality and incomprehensible equations. Despite its formal acceptance, the manuscript never underwent copy editing due to these glaring issues.
Read more: Publication Dilemma: Revisiting an Article Accepted Five Years Ago
Journal A recently received a submission delving into a systematic review/meta-analysis concerning a specific country's health issue. Interestingly, the manuscript was authored by four individuals residing outside the country in question, with no apparent professional ties to local institutions or researchers. Notably, the study relied solely on published references, devoid of any primary data collection or analyses.
Read more: Navigating a Systematic Review on a Country's Health Problem by Non-Native Authors
📌 Monograph: TRANSFORMATIONS OF NATIONAL ECONOMIES UNDER CONDITIONS OF INSTABILITY
📌 Direction: Economics
📌 Name: Scientific Route OÜ®(Estonia)
📌 Year of publication: 2024
📌 Indexing: Scopus
📌 Cost: from 300 euros
Read more: LAST CHAPTER TO THE COLLECTIVE MONOGRAPH AT A SPECIAL PRICE!
A recent article (referred to as Article A), authored by Group X, has sparked controversy following a formal complaint by Group Y, alleging infringement of their intellectual property rights. Group Y contends that Article A incorporates their jointly developed concept and resources, thus warranting acknowledgment or inclusion as authors.
Read more: Dispute Arises Over Alleged Intellectual Property Breach in Scientific Publication
In the realm of academic publishing, understanding the nuances of plagiarism and self-plagiarism is essential for researchers striving for integrity in their work. Exploring the acceptable thresholds of textual similarity sheds light on the standards upheld by scholarly journals and monographs.
When tasked with evaluating a scientific article, reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the integrity and quality of scholarly discourse. While subjectivity may influence their opinions, it should never compromise the thoroughness of their analysis or adherence to established criteria. Here's a structured approach to crafting a review:
Read more: Mastering the Art of Reviewing Scientific Articles: A Comprehensive Guide
Title: “TRANSFORMATIONS OF NATIONAL ECONOMIES UNDER CONDITIONS OF INSTABILITY”.
Publisher: Scientific Route OÜ® (Estonia).
Indexing: Scopus, Google Scholar, Zenodo, Digar and others.
Catalog of publications - here.
Submission requirements are here.
The year of publication is 2024.
The cost of publishing a section is here.
A unique 50% discount is available for authors from Ukraine.
To submit your material, you can use the “Submit a manuscript” function on the website or contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for assistance.
Instances of reviewer citation manipulation have been on the rise, prompting concerns within the academic community. This unethical practice involves reviewers requesting authors to cite papers authored by the reviewer themselves, thereby distorting the integrity of the peer review process.
Read more: Addressing Reviewer Citation Manipulation in Scholarly Publishing